Hello Everyone,
The readings for the indigena discussion on the 26th are now up (you're welcome Gaby :0).
There are two readings for the discussion, the first by Gunter Dietz is a very similar history to that of Hector Diaz-Polanco's, in the sense that it moves us chronologically through Mexican Native-State Relations. There are, however, some very major differences. Some things to think about as we do the reading:
1. Were is the narrative focused? How does this differ with Diaz?
2. What is the role of "acculturation" of certain indigenous actors here? Does it facilitate, hinder, destroy or reinforce?
3. Does this reading go further in providing some of the material you asked for in your second posts?
4. How can we make this reading reflect back onto the strategies used in the EJ struggle on the Mexican side of the border? Are there similar patterns, or perhaps lessons?
Of course, no need to blog--these will be just questions to hopefully spur discussion.
The second article narrows our focus even further, providing a fly on the wall's perspective on a community meeting in the Huichol heartland. After our readings and lecture regarding the macro-level patterns, this reading (and the short additional readings assigned for my lecture) provides a nice, compressed case to deconstruct. In reading this article, let's think about the various actors and who/what they represent.
Additionally, however, let's also think about the claims being made here on the part of the Huichol elders. What is the role of human rights in this reading? What is the role of cultural rights? Is one being priviliged over the other, and if so, what does that mean for the Mexican State? What is its role here, and what does it have to gain or lose? Finally, how are these issues related to those of the indigenous peoples at the border?
See you on Weds. morning, and remember that you can call me with any questions over the weekend.
